South-Central Pennsylvania's Ultra-Hip Pop Culture Mecca™! Since its founding in 1988 by local fans Ned Senft and Bill Wahl, Comix Connection™ has served the Pennsylvania comic-reading community for over 25 years. From its humble beginnings in the old York Book Emporium in downtown York to its current globe-straddling locations in the West Manchester Mall in York and on the Carlisle Pike in Mechanicsburg, Comix Connection™ has always provided the very best in customer service, selection of neat stuff and attention to detail. Visit us today! Questions? Comments? Call or Email us! Of course, all images are © and ™ their respective copyright and trademark holders! No matter where you go, there you are.

Thursday, November 05, 2009

One of the coolest Halloween costumes I've ever seen

I was paging through the Internet the other day when I ran across this awesome Halloween costume idea:


More HERE!

I would imagine it's based on this:


More on Roy Lichtenstein HERE!


People never cease to amaze me.

Labels: , , ,

11 Comments:

At 11/05/2009 8:28 AM, Blogger phatmogera said...

I love the costume, but you've hit one of my hot buttons: Roy Lichtenstein is a plagiarist who owed his career to other people's work and then when he was questioned about it, stated that his copies are more of an artform than the original sources. He got his career started by stealing money from other artist's pockets, and then laughed at them very much like a bully stealing lunch money, only he was stealing home payment money. The guy was an (expletive deleted).

(self edited, BTW)

 
At 11/05/2009 8:37 AM, Blogger Bill at Comix Connection said...

Hey, I agree. Every biography of him dances around the theft of images he perpetrated. It's ridiculous.

 
At 11/05/2009 8:39 AM, Blogger Bill at Comix Connection said...

Oh and you can spend literally hours arguing this with the art crowd. I have.

 
At 11/05/2009 2:36 PM, Blogger phatmogera said...

Yeah, I have a few well connected art friends that love his work, one even knows the family. He knows not to start this topic with me since I get fired up.

 
At 11/05/2009 2:56 PM, Blogger stymieresh said...

Not to change the subject (hopefully...) i'd love to see more photos of this makeup. Bill, if you find any you gotta post 'em!

 
At 11/05/2009 9:11 PM, Blogger Bill at Comix Connection said...

stymieresh, did you click on the "More HERE!" under the first photo?

There's THIS too that shows the models attire better... and check the video.

 
At 11/06/2009 10:19 AM, Blogger stymieresh said...

Yup i did the clickage, but didn't see that last photo there. Niiice. Very clever.
HOLY COW, my word verification for today is "juggis" bwah ha ha ha ha!

 
At 11/06/2009 9:18 PM, Blogger Steve said...

Did you see this one from Metafilter?

Real life Big Head mode

 
At 11/07/2009 7:07 AM, Blogger Bill at Comix Connection said...

Steve - Yeah, that's pretty awesome too!

 
At 7/10/2011 10:13 PM, Anonymous Verian said...

Great information and very interesting. I got lucky and found your site from a random Google search. Thanks a lot! ♥

Contemporary Artist

 
At 10/28/2011 5:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Phatmogera, The term you are looking for isn't stealing but rather appropriation. Although it is a fine line, it is the context that makes a difference. There is a lot besides the drawing or picture that goes into the reading of images, the context is also very important. The originals that were used were obviously scenes from comic books but when they were viewed they played a role in a narrative as a unit an progressive story in a palm sized book. The paintings by Roy Lichtenstein, are only singular frames freed from narrative. The only connection they have to their source is the fact that we recognize the characters from that narrative but in that isolating manner leaving us to forget about the narrative and focus on the production of images in the same manner warhol did with his soup cans. The meaning is derived through context. The image only acts as a referent and not as a story changing its context and making it a valid artwork on its own. Also, as far as your argument that the artist was stealing bread money from the comic artist is hardly arguable seeing as the person who would go and buy the painting is more than likely not interested in buying the comic book story. One is an original while the other is a mass produced product (also part of the reason why lichtenstein's art works so well).

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home